Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014t64gn17s
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Manning, Alan | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-26T01:44:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-26T01:44:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008-12-01T00:00:00Z | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014t64gn17s | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper shows, using data from both the US and the UK, that average plant size is larger in denser markets. However, many popular theories of agglomeration – spillovers, cost advantages and improved match quality – predict that establishments should be smaller in cities. The paper proposes a theory based on monopsony in labour markets that can explain the stylized fact – that firms in all labour markets have some market power but that they have less market power in cities. It also presents evidence that the labour supply curve to individual firms is more elastic in larger markets. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 539 | en_US |
dc.subject | Agglomeration | en_US |
dc.subject | Labour markets | en_US |
dc.subject | Monopsony | en_US |
dc.title | The Plant Size-Place Effect: Agglomeration and Monopsony in Labour Markets | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
pu.projectgrantnumber | 360-2050 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
539.pdf | 2.68 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.