Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014j03d211s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorLeslie, Sarah-Jane-
dc.contributor.advisorFrick, Johann-
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Jordan-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T13:04:41Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-20T13:04:41Z-
dc.date.created2016-03-30-
dc.date.issued2016-07-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014j03d211s-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines various ethical implications of neurological enhancement—the use of biotechnical means to make the brain “better than well.” I argue that cognitive and mood enhancement can threaten important things of value. Specifically, cognitive enhancement erodes the need for perseverance as resilience, and mood enhancement exposes individuals with certain character traits to harmful pressures.en_US
dc.format.extent68 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleNeurological Enhancement: Cognitive and Mood Enhancement as Possible Threats to Things of Valueen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ORIGINAL318.46 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.