Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0144558d29c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, James N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:43:45Z-
dc.date.issued1983-10-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0144558d29c-
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the growth in wages that employees experience with increasing tenure in a given position. More specifically, the work presented in this paper seeks to determine how much of this observed wage growth can be attributed to on-the—job training and how much remains to be attributed to other factors that might cause wages to increase with tenure independently of training or productivity. The basic finding of this work is that on-the-job training appears to explain a substantial share of the total wage growth experienced in a given position. Indeed, there appears to be little wage growth remaining to be explained by other factors, once training is completed or has been held constant.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 169en_US
dc.titleAre Those Paid More Really No More Productive? Measuring the Relative Importance of Tenure Versus On-The-Job Training in Explaining Wage Growthen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
169.pdf2.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.