Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013t945t12h
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFernández-Kelly, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorBasile, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-15T13:45:04Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-15T13:45:04Z-
dc.date.created2015-04-10-
dc.date.issued2015-07-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013t945t12h-
dc.description.abstractThe pronounced expansion of criminal justice policy both in scope and severity has been labeled by numerous scholars as consituting a 'punitive turn' in U.S. criminal justice policy. The Chief purpose of this essay is to first detail the individual policies that 'layered' the development of the existing punitive system, then to assess the importance or role of public opinion in this development, and ultimately determine the success/failure of this punitive turn to accomplish its stated goals and address the underlying societal issues. As a result, by tracing public opinion towards the punitive turn, this paper intends to determine which groups are responsible for the punitive turns relative success or failure.en_US
dc.format.extent63 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleThe Punitive Solution: Mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, Incarceration, and Public Acceptanceen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentSociologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Sociology, 1954-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-Basile_Robert.pdf3.27 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.