Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013j333232r
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPronin, Emilyen_US
dc.contributor.advisorTodorov, Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Katherine Elizabethen_US
dc.contributor.otherPsychology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-21T13:33:35Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-21T05:14:57Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013j333232r-
dc.description.abstractPeople are quick to point out bias in others, yet are reticent to admit to bias in themselves. This dissertation explores the depths of this "bias blind spot" while putting forth a manipulation to overcome it. A series of studies first explores the psychological effects of knowingly using a biased decision-making strategy. Despite recognizing bias in their strategy, participants still saw their decision outcome as objective (even though they had actually been biased). After investigating an alternative mechanism, the current research suggests that this finding is due to bias occurring unconsciously. When judging others, people focus on the person's behavior for signs of bias. However, when judging the self, people look inwardly and mistakenly rely on introspection. This dissertation puts forth that this self-other asymmetry in bias attribution could be manipulated to increase objectivity. That is, when trying to make a decision that would appear objective to an observer, participants made more objective decisions than when asked to simply be objective or when left to make their own decision. In a series of studies, I demonstrate the efficacy of asking people to make a decision that appears objective. I then examine a downstream consequence of the manipulation to appear objective, presenting evidence that it improves interpersonal behavior. I then establish that this manipulation does not lead to reactance in private beliefs. Finally, a pair of studies establish how the appear-objective manipulation leads to greater willingness to blind oneself to potentially biasing information, indicating its usefulness in situations where there is not a clearly objective decision to make. Despite showing people's pervasive tendency to see themselves and the decisions that they make in an objective light, this dissertation puts forth a successful manipulation to increase the objectivity of people's decisions. By shifting the focus of attention away from internal thoughts and intentions and onto external behavior, the objectivity of people's decisions can be increased despite the persistent existence of the bias blind spot. With a simple instruction, people can overcome a host of biases in their decisions, from sexism to self-serving bias.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectbiasen_US
dc.subjectbias correctionen_US
dc.subjectblind spoten_US
dc.subjectdecision-makingen_US
dc.subject.classificationSocial psychologyen_US
dc.titleThe Bias Blind Spot and Making Objective Decisions Despite Iten_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2015-05-21en_US
Appears in Collections:Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hansen_princeton_0181D_10569.pdf1.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.