Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0137720c874
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMauzerall, Denise Len_US
dc.contributor.authorKanter, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.otherPublic and International Affairs Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T19:44:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-05T19:44:46Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0137720c874-
dc.description.abstractMy dissertation studies several of the major scientific, economic and policy issues central to managing global nitrogen (N) pollution. Chapter 2 uses the terrestrial component of an Earth System model to evaluate how global improvements in N use efficiency (NUE) could affect agricultural nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions - an important component of global N pollution. Emissions are projected to increase significantly in a business-as-usual scenario - driven by growth in global fertilizer and manure consumption - though less markedly than previous estimates, due to increased crop N uptake. Nevertheless, global NUE scenarios could reduce global N2O emissions below 1990-2000 levels, delivering important climate and stratospheric ozone benefits. Chapter 3 is the first evaluation of improved N management measures to consider the economic interests of the fertilizer industry in tandem with farmers and the environment. It demonstrates that the regulatory "sweet spot" - where improved N management benefits the environment, reduces farmers' costs, and increases fertilizer industry profitability - is more likely to occur in China than the U.S. due to the currently extensive over-application of fertilizer, which creates a greater potential for economic gains from improved N management. The fact that the environmental benefits of improving N management consistently dwarf its economic impacts on farmers and the fertilizer industry suggests that policy-makers should consider investing in side-payments to increase stakeholder support. Chapter 4 addresses the major scientific, legal, technical and policy questions that would have to be considered by the Parties to the international ozone regime if they decided to control N2O. It identifies several legal avenues for controlling N2O, provides a sector-by-sector overview of the major N2O mitigation strategies, and outlines how existing policies managing N2O and other N compounds could be harnessed to implement controls. Finally, it describes three of the major challenges and potential co-benefits of controlling N2O (and N pollution more broadly): food security, equity, and the N cascade. Chapter 5 concludes with a research proposal to study how calls for an international response to N pollution can be reconciled with the reality that solutions are often locally specific.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectGlobal nitrogen pollutionen_US
dc.subject.classificationEnvironmental studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationBiogeochemistryen_US
dc.subject.classificationAgriculture economicsen_US
dc.titleReturning to a Planetary Boundary for Nitrogen: Science, Economics and Policyen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Public and International Affairs

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kanter_princeton_0181D_11001.pdf11.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.