Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012v23vt376
Title: | A Comparison of Interest Arbitrator Decision -Making in Experimental and Field Settings |
Authors: | Olson, Craig A. Dell'Omo, Gregory |
Keywords: | interest arbitration arbitrator decision-making experimental economics public sector bargaining |
Issue Date: | 1-May-1991 |
Citation: | Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 4, July, 1992 |
Series/Report no.: | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 284 |
Abstract: | Recent studies have investigated arbitrator decision rules in both experimental and field settings. The external validity of experimental studies is evaluated by comparing the decisions made in an experiment with those made in actual cases for a common group of arbitrators. The results show the decision models used in the two settings are very similar when the decision problem in the two settings is carefully controlled to be the same. |
URI: | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012v23vt376 |
Related resource: | http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0019-7939%28199207%2945%3A4%3C711%3AACOIAD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H |
Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
284.pdf | 1.94 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.