Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012j62s7799
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBolinger, Renee-
dc.contributor.authorLord, Harry-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T17:47:48Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-22T17:47:48Z-
dc.date.created2020-05-04-
dc.date.issued2020-07-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012j62s7799-
dc.description.abstractGiven the overwhelming scale and complexity of climate change, it is unclear whether individuals can make a difference, and if they can be considered morally responsible. This paper raises skepticism about arguments that relegate the importance of individuals’ roles qua individuals in climate mitigation. It highlights reasons to reconsider the importance of reducing personal emissions by exploring the mistakenly narrow framing of such reductions in 'anti-individual' arguments about moral responsibility.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleORIGINALen_US
dc.titlelicense.txt-
dc.titleORIGINALen_US
dc.titleORIGINALen_US
dc.titleRethinking Unilateralism: Personal Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Moral Discourse on Anthropogenic Climate Changeen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2020en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid920057768-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LORD-HARRY-THESIS.pdf457.01 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.