Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011j92gb411
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorElga, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorShteingart, Jacob-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-22T19:20:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-22T19:20:18Z-
dc.date.created2020-05-04-
dc.date.issued2020-07-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011j92gb411-
dc.description.abstractI evaluate a case of an individual with diminished cognitive capacities. I make the specific claim that proxies are permissible for the creation and updating of wills. I also establish a general framework for the evaluation of desires and interests. Then, I use a framework of ideal agency to argue that, if they adequately fulfill the individual’s agential capacities, proxies are permissible and should be used. This has widespread implications, especially with the rise of AI.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleA Proxy for the Future: Desires, Interests, and Increased Power for Proxiesen_US
dc.titleDSPACESAcensus2011MunicipalFreeState.pdf.txt-
dc.titleA Proxy for the Future: Desires, Interests, and Increased Power for Proxiesen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2020en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid961169049-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SHTEINGART-JACOB-THESIS.pdf295.91 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.