Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011j92g764gFull metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Rosen, Gideon | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Siegel, Max | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-17T14:22:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-07-17T14:22:17Z | - |
| dc.date.created | 2014-03-31 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-07-17 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011j92g764g | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this thesis, I undertake a linguistic analysis of the truth conditions for ‘ought’-claims and present a challenge to the objectivity of ethics that follows from this analysis. Specifically, I argue that one who holds ethics to be objective cannot account for the determinate truth or falsity of ‘ought’-claims. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 41 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | DEONTIC MODALS AND NORMATIVE REALISM | en_US |
| dc.type | Princeton University Senior Theses | - |
| pu.date.classyear | 2014 | en_US |
| pu.department | Philosophy | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Philosophy, 1924-2020 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SiegelMaxST2014.pdf | 257.49 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.