Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011j92g7565
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMorison, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorCadiz, Victoria-
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-15T15:41:16Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-15T15:41:16Z-
dc.date.created2013-04-01-
dc.date.issued2013-07-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011j92g7565-
dc.description.abstractSince Aquinas' writings in the 13th century, natural law theorists have attributed natural law theory to Aristotle to varying degrees, citing specific passages in his Nicomachean Ethics. This thesis highlights the flaws and misinterpretations present in the natural law theorists' reading of Aristotle and concludes by rejecting the claim that Aristotle's ethical system - known as virtue ethics - supports natural law theory, though the two are not necessarily incompatible.en_US
dc.format.extent85 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleAristotle's Virtue Ethics & Natural Law Theory: Contextualizing Passages from Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Cited as Support for Natural Law Theoryen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2013en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
dc.rights.accessRightsWalk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the <a href=http://mudd.princeton.edu>Mudd Manuscript Library</a>.-
pu.mudd.walkinyes-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
CadizVictoriaThesis.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.