Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011544bp10v
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBloom, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:55:22Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:55:22Z-
dc.date.issued1980-05-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp011544bp10v-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the effect of final-offer arbitration on the salaries of municipal police officers in New Jersey using a regression model to control for the possible biases introduced by non-random use of the procedure. The results indicate that, despite the greater fraction of union victories than employer victories under final-offer arbitration, arbitrated salary settlements are not significantly higher or lower than nonarbitrated settlements. The results also contain evidence of asymmetric behavior by the parties under final-offer arbitration with the unions appearing more risk averse than the employers.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 129en_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Final Offer Arbitration on the Salaries of Municipal Police Officers in New Jerseyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
129.pdf2.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.