Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0108612q84b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBotvinick, Matthew Men_US
dc.contributor.authorKool, Wouteren_US
dc.contributor.otherPsychology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T19:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-23T19:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0108612q84b-
dc.description.abstractPsychological theories have long maintained that tasks are chosen so as to minimize demands for cognitive exertion. This principle, known as the law of least mental effort, had, until recently, not been subjected to a direct test. However, a recent of studies has shown that people tend to avoid cognitive effort. The current work builds on this finding. An initial set of experiments shows that demand avoidance does not merely reflect a tendency to maximize reward rate, or minimize the time needed to accurately reach task goals. In addition, they provide evidence for an important secondary prediction from the hypothesis that cognitive effort is associated with intrinsic disutility, namely that countervailing incentives increased the propensity to exert mental effort. Daily life rarely offers a categorical choice between cognitive exertion and rest. Instead, most real life decisions involving effort are time-based, requiring an allocation decision between profitable but mentally demanding activities and activities that are undemanding but also unproductive. Results from four economic-choice experiments indicate that such decisions are guided by a motivation to strike an optimal balance between income and leisure, a principle derived from economic theories of labor supply. Demands for cognitive control are ubiquitous in every day life, and therefore it is important to consider whether the intrinsic disutility of its exertion affects decisions studied in the broader field of psychological science. An individual difference experiment takes some of the first steps in this endeavor, probing a relationship between the avoidance of demands for mental effort and the capacity for self-controlled behavior. Earlier research has revealed an important role for the prefrontal cortex in the registration of effort costs, but the role of neuromodulation in this process is less clear. We report a genotyping study that reveals a role for dopaminergic functioning in the representation of mental effort costs, analogous to findings in the animal literature on physical effort-based decision making. This work reports initial progress in the understanding of the theoretical, behavioral, and neural implications for the intrinsic cost of cognitive control.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectDopamineen_US
dc.subjectEfforten_US
dc.subjectLabor economicsen_US
dc.subjectSelf controlen_US
dc.subject.classificationCognitive psychologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationNeurosciencesen_US
dc.titleThe intrinsic cost of cognitive control: Behavioral Phenomenology and Neural Correlatesen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kool_princeton_0181D_11297.pdf3.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.