Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0102870z269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLevin, Simon Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrush, Eleanor Redstarten_US
dc.contributor.otherQuantitative Computational Biology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T19:51:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-07T19:51:09Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0102870z269-
dc.description.abstractSocial systems occur at all levels of biological organization. A full understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sociality requires that we study how groups can maintain cohesion, despite conflicts of interest between their members, and how collective phenomena emerge out of individuals' behaviors. In this thesis, I develop and study a set of mathematical models to answer these questions. Each model is inspired and grounded by a particular empirical system, but their generality allows me to identify common principles that underlie sociality across systems. First, by extending a standard model of indirect reciprocity, I find that cooperation can be maintained by discriminators that observe themselves more frequently than they observe other types of individuals, even if they have limited and imperfect information. Second, by studying a model of opinion dynamics driven by environmental information, I find that the evolutionarily stable strategy for gathering social information depends on the content of the information, and only when individuals are trying to learn about certain properties of the environment do they construct an optimal interaction network. Third, I develop a set of measures to quantify the degree of consensus in an interaction network about individuals' values. I find that a global property of the interaction network is informative about individuals' functions in three empirical systems: a subordination-signaling network in macaques, a physicist collaboration network, and a gene interaction network. Fourth, I use a model of stochastic decision-making to describe the development of the signaling network. I find that conflicts of interest can incentivize the group to make more accurate decisions and that the skewness of the distribution of power that emerges is most strongly affected by the costs of waiting for a decision. A similar stochastic model has previously been applied to neural decision-making, which suggests that there are common principles of collective computation across systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: http://catalog.princeton.edu/en_US
dc.subjectcollective computationen_US
dc.subjectconsensusen_US
dc.subjectcooperationen_US
dc.subjectevolutionen_US
dc.subjectinformationen_US
dc.subjectsocial systemen_US
dc.subject.classificationBiologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEcologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationMathematicsen_US
dc.titleMathematical Models of Cooperation, Consensus, and Collective Computationen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Quantitative Computational Biology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brush_princeton_0181D_11479.pdf2.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.