Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0100000282s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGros, Jean-Germain-
dc.contributor.authorProkopovych, Olga-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-07T17:58:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-07T17:58:36Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.issn2869781598-
dc.identifier.issn9782869781597-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0100000282s-
dc.descriptionThis four-part study critically examines World Bank lending policy behaviour in historical, theoretical and empirical perspectives. Its main arguments, each substantiated separately, are three-fold. Firstly, Bank lending policies have been heavily influenced by western development discourses (e.g., modernization theory), which have been mostly neo-liberal but, at times, challenged by counterworldviews stemming from the harmful impacts of neo-liberalism as policy (e.g., Structural Adjustment Programs) in dependent countries. As a result, although neo-liberalism, is at the core of Bank ideology, it does not always, and single-handedly, determine Bank policy. Where the World Bank is concerned, ideology is expressed in an organizational context and the larger environment of North-South relations, which require the balancing of all three. Thus the study develops a theoretical model of World Bank policy behaviour in Part II based on open systems theory, bureaucratic politics theory (as developed by Allison and Hallerin) and, to a lesser extent, rational choice theory. Much of the gap, between Bank rhetoric and policy reality, is explained theoretically in this section. In Part III the study presents empirical evidence in support of the contention that lending policy continues to follow a familiar pattern, namely, in spite of rhetorical commitment to poverty reduction worldwide, Bank funds do not always go to the world’s poorest countries, nor are they used to finance projects that most directly affect the poor in borrowing countries. Finally, in Part IV the study ponders whether the World Bank should be reformed or rethought (i.e., eliminated).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCODESRIA Monograph Seriesen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.codesria.orgen_US
dc.subjectWorld Banken_US
dc.subjectDeveloping Countriesen_US
dc.subjectEconomic assistanceen_US
dc.subjectLoans, Foreignen_US
dc.titleWhen Reality Contradicts Rhetoric : World Bank Lending Practices in Developing Countries in Historical, Theoretical and Empirical Perspectivesen_US
pu.depositorCordonnier, Deborah-
dc.publisher.placeDakar, Senegalen_US
dc.publisher.corporateCODESRIA (Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa)en_US
Appears in Collections:Serials and series reports (Publicly Accessible) - CODESRIA

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gros.pdf385.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.